Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Fitriadi M Rifqi vs Matthew Hulme Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rifqi vs Hulme analysis and find out who is favored!
Fitriadi M Rifqi vs Matthew Hulme Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rifqi 1 - 0 Hulme
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rifqi has won 51.86% of points on their second serve, while Hulme has won 52.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rifqi, in recent form, has won 51.94% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hulme has won 46.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.94% and 28.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rifqi has saved 57.47% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hulme has saved 65.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rifqi has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 24/ 15), with Hulme winning 57.58% (W/L 38/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rifqi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 68/ 52), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Hulme has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Rifqi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.11% of matches (W/L 22/ 14), where as Hulme has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 35/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rifqi winning 1 times and Hulme being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Rifqi winning 2 and Hulme winning 1. The last match between Rifqi and Hulme was at the M25 Chennai, 25-01-2024, Second, Hard with Fitriadi M Rifqi getting the victory 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rifqi and Hulme have played a deciding set 1 times, with Rifqi winning 1 times and Hulme 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Rifqi winning 1, and Hulme 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rifqi has played against opponents with an average rank of 125.54 while Hulme has played against players with an average rank of 108.97.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rifqi has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hulme has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rifqi has converted 37.78% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hulme has converted 40.34% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
666
Rank
530
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
841
Rank
835
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
56% (68-53)
Career Total W/L
53% (54-48)
54% (7-6)
YTD W/L
62% (24-15)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Fitriadi M Rifqi | Matthew Hulme |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:0:0 | 3:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (73/117) | 66% (76/115) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (56/73) | 72% (55/76) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (25/44) | 59% (23/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 13% (1/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 32% (37/115) | 31% (36/117) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Stats 
Fitriadi M Rifqi
Player
Matthew Hulme
62%
(
73 of
117)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
115)
3
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
55 of
76)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
36 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
37 of
115)
118
Total Points Won
114
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Fitriadi M Rifqi | Matthew Hulme |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (7/6) | 62% (24/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (15/15) | 57% (54/40) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (136/139) | 52% (491/447) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 64% (21/12) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0.46 |
| Aces Total | 19 | 212 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 75 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:25 | 1:31:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 181.15 | 106.05 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (534/883) | 69% (1767/2570) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (359/534) | 71% (1251/1767) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (181/349) | 52% (419/803) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (34/90) | 40% (71/176) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (350/886) | 35% (878/2515) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 60% (3/2) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (5/5) | 62% (21/13) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (7/13) | 61% (23/38) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 39% (7/18) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 60% (9/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 85% (20/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 15% (20/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 37% (19/7) |
Fitriadi M Rifqi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Fitriadi M Rifqi
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fitriadi M Rifqi
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
8
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
51%
(
52 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fitriadi M Rifqi
Player
Dominik Palan
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
50
Total Points Won
39
|
7-6(1) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maik Steiner
Player
Fitriadi M Rifqi
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fitriadi M Rifqi
Player
Pruchya Isarow
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
100%
(
22 of
22)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Fitriadi M Rifqi
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
11
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fitriadi M Rifqi
Player
Maik Steiner
61%
(
62 of
102)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
99)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
34%
(
35 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fitriadi M Rifqi
Player
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
1
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Fitriadi M Rifqi
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fitriadi M Rifqi
Player
Matthew Hulme
62%
(
73 of
117)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
115)
3
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
55 of
76)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
36 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
37 of
115)
118
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Matthew Hulme Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matt Kuhar
Player
Matthew Hulme
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
Matthew Hulme
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Finn Bass
Player
Matthew Hulme
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Luke Simkiss
76%
(
77 of
101)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Michael Shaw
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
48 of
65)
2
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 3-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Fabio Nestola
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Matthew Hulme
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
12 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Matthew Hulme
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Petr Nesterov
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Rifqi Vs Hulme Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
